Marco Arambula v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-18-00395-CR
Marco ARAMBULA,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2017CR9973
Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 14, 2018
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court’s judgment should be
modified to delete the imposition of a $1,000 fine because the trial court did not impose the fine
in orally pronouncing sentence. The State concedes error and prays that the judgment be modified
to remove the fine and affirmed in all other respects.
BACKGROUND
Appellant Marco Arambula was charged with aggravated robbery. Pursuant to a plea
bargain agreement, he pled no contest to the offense on November 17, 2017. The trial court
04-18-00395-CR
deferred adjudicating his guilt and placed him on five years’ community supervision. The trial
court also imposed a $1,000 fine.
On February 8, 2018, the State filed a motion to enter adjudication of guilt and revoke
community supervision alleging, in pertinent part, that Arambula had violated a condition of his
community supervision by failing to report to his probation officer for the months of December
2017 and January 2018. At the hearing on the State’s motion, Arambula pled true to violating this
condition of his probation. The trial court found the violation was true, adjudicated Arambula
guilty, and orally pronounced Arambula’s sentence as five years’ imprisonment. The trial court
subsequently signed a written judgment that adjudicated Arambula’s guilt and sentenced him to
five years’ imprisonment and a $1,000 fine. Arambula appeals.
DISCUSSION
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals resolved the sole issue presented in this appeal in
Taylor v. State, 131 S.W.3d 497 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). In Taylor, the order deferring Ronald
Taylor’s adjudication “contained a fine of $300, which the judge orally pronounced at that time.”
131 S.W.3d at 498. “Later, when Taylor’s guilt was adjudicated, the judge did not orally
pronounce a fine but included the $300 fine within the written judgment.” Id. Although the court
noted “this action would be permissible in a case involving regular probation,” the court concluded
“the fine must be deleted in this case because of the unique circumstances of deferred
adjudication.” The court explained:
[W]hen an accused receives deferred adjudication, no sentence is imposed. Then,
when guilt is adjudicated, the order adjudicating guilt sets aside the order deferring
adjudication, including the previously imposed fine. This is in stark contrast to
regular probation, where the sentence is imposed but suspended when probation is
granted.
Id. at 502. Applying the law to the facts in Taylor, the court reasoned:
-2-
04-18-00395-CR
[T]he order granting Taylor deferred adjudication was set aside. Taylor was not
sentenced until his guilt was adjudicated. At that time, the judge did not orally
pronounce a fine, but included a fine within the written judgment. When there is a
conflict between the two, the oral pronouncement controls. Since the judge did not
orally assess a fine as part of Taylor’s sentence when guilt was adjudicated, the
Court of Appeals was correct to delete the fine from the judgment.
Id. Because the trial court in the instant case did not orally pronounce a fine after revoking
Arambula’s deferred adjudication community supervision and adjudicating his guilt, but included
a fine within the written judgment, we sustain Arambula’s issue. See id.; see also Kaska v. State,
No. 04-15-00742-CR, 2016 WL 4444417, at *3 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Aug. 24, 2016, no pet.)
(mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing Taylor as precedent for modifying trial court
judgment to delete fine).
CONCLUSION
Based on the precedent established in Taylor, we modify the trial court’s judgment to delete
the imposition of the $1,000 fine and affirm the judgment as modified.
Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-3-