DocketNumber： 10-00-00354-CV
Filed Date： 11/1/2000
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/19/2018
Â
Â
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-00-354-CV
IN RE AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY
Original Proceeding
                                                                                                               Â
O P I N I O N
                                                                                                               Â
      Amerisure Insurance Company petitions this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against Respondent, the Honorable Ralph Strother, Judge of the 19th District Court of McLennan County. However, the mandamus record provided by Amerisure reflects that the Honorable Bill Logue presided over the hearing in which Amerisure sought to compel the real party in interest to submit to a medical examination under Rule of Civil Procedure 204. Judge Logue signed the order denying Amerisureâs motion. Amerisure has failed to name the proper respondent. We deny the petition. See Jampole v. Touchy, 673 S.W.2d 569, 572 (Tex. 1984) (orig. proceeding); Gaal v. Townsend, 77 Tex. 464, 465, 14 S.W. 365, 365 (1890); Pelt v. Johnson, 818 S.W.2d 212, 215 (Tex. App.âWaco 1991, orig. proceeding); City of Beaumont v. Stephenson, 95 S.W.2d 1360, 1364-65 (Tex. Civ. App.âBeaumont 1936, writ dismâd); Tex. R. App. P. 52.2.
                                                                   PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Davis,
      Justice Vance, and
      Justice Gray
Writ denied
Opinion delivered and filed November 1, 2000
Publish
eptember 10, 2008
Do not publish
[CR25]
[1] This court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly granted by law. See Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386 (Tex. App.ÂWaco 2002, no pet.). An intermediate court of appeals has no jurisdiction over postconviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. See Ex parte Martinez, 175 S.W.3d 510, 512-13 (Tex. App.ÂTexarkana 2005, orig. proceeding) (citing Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07(3)(a), (b) (Vernon 2005)); Self v. State, 122 S.W.3d 294, 294-95 (Tex. App.ÂEastland 2003, no pet.) (same). The Court of Criminal Appeals and lower courts have recognized that Âthe exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to [article] 11. 07. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see Ex parte Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d 260, 261 (Tex. App.ÂWaco 2006, no pet.).