DocketNumber： 03-97-00756-CR
Filed Date： 4/22/1999
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/5/2015
Appellant Donald Lee Busby entered a plea of guilty to the offense of misapplication of fiduciary property and was granted community supervision. On July 7, 1997, the trial court heard the State's motion to revoke appellant's community supervision. The court refused to revoke and continued appellant on community supervision, but amended the conditions of community supervision ordering appellant to "[p]ay court costs in the amount of $283,050.21 dollars to the Community Supervision officer, to be paid $2,600 per month beginning 9-1-97 ($156.50 court costs, $282,863.71 Attorney fees, $30.00 pre-sentence Investigation fee)." The attorney fees were to reimburse Bell County for payment of a special prosecutor's fee.
In this appeal, appellant asserts that the trial court did not have lawful authority to order the payment of the special prosecutor's fee either as court costs or as a condition of community supervision. We agree. These same issues have been decided in appellant's favor in a companion case. This Court held in the companion case that appellant could not be required to reimburse the county for a special prosecutor's fee either as court costs or as a condition of probation. See Busby v. State, 951 S.W.2d 928 (Tex. App.--Austin 1997, pet. granted). The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the judgment of this Court. See Busby v. State, 984 S.W.2d 627 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).
The eleventh condition of community supervision is reformed to delete the requirement that appellant pay $282,863.71 in attorney fees. As reformed, the order of the trial court is affirmed.
Carl E. F. Dally, Justice
Before Justices Jones, B. A. Smith and Dally*
Reformed and, as Reformed, Affirmed
Filed: April 22, 1999
Do Not Publish
* Before Carl E. F. Dally, Judge (retired), Court of Criminal Appeals, sitting by assignment. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.003(b) (West 1998).
>
Appellant Donald Lee Busby entered a plea of guilty to the offense of misapplication of fiduciary property and was granted community supervision. On July 7, 1997, the trial court heard the State's motion to revoke appellant's community supervision. The court refused to revoke and continued appellant on community supervision, but amended the conditions of community supervision ordering appellant to "[p]ay court costs in the amount of $283,050.21 dollars to the Community Supervision officer, to be paid $2,600 per month beginning 9-1-97 ($156.50 court costs, $282,863.71 Attorney fees, $30.00 pre-sentence Investigation fee)." The attorney fees were to reimburse Bell County for payment of a special prosecutor's fee.
In this appeal, appellant asserts that the trial court did not have lawful authority to order the payment of the special prosecutor's fee either as court costs or as a condition of community supervision. We agree. These same issues have been decided in appellant's favor in a companion case. This Court held in the companion case that appellant could not be required to reimburse the county for a special prosecutor's fee either as court costs or as a condition of probation. See Busby v. State, 951 S.W.2d 928 (Tex. App.--Austin 1997, pet. granted). The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the judgment of this Court. See Busby v. State, 984 S.W.2d 627 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).
The eleventh condition of community supervision is reformed to delete the requirement that appellant pay $282,863.71 in attorney fees. As reformed, the order of the trial court is affirmed.
Carl E. F. Dally, Justice
Before Justices Jones, B. A. Smith and Dally*
Reformed and, as Reformed, Affirmed
Filed: April 22, 1999
Do Not Publish
* Before Carl E. F. Dally, Judge (retired), Court of Criminal Appeals, sitting by assignment. See Tex.