DocketNumber: 03-01-00673-CR
Filed Date: 1/17/2002
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/6/2015
No motion for new trial will lie from an order deferring adjudication. Hammack v. State, 963 S.W.2d 199, 200 (Tex. App.--Austin 1998, no pet.). Rogerio's motion for new trial was a nullity and did not extend the time for perfecting appeal. Id. at 201; see also Tex. R. App. P. 26.2. Because notice of appeal was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. Id.; see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
The appeal is dismissed.
Jan P. Patterson, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: January 17, 2002
Do Not Publish