DocketNumber: 04-99-00589-CV
Filed Date: 4/26/2000
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/6/2015
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 26, 2000
APPEAL DISMISSED
The appellant in the above numbered and styled appeal has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, stating that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences in the underlying lawsuit. The motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the case is now moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Bulter, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex. 1981); Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1995, no writ.). The costs of this appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH