DocketNumber: 10-17-00372-CV
Filed Date: 4/18/2018
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 4/20/2018
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-17-00372-CV IN THE INTEREST OF S.R., A CHILD From the County Court at Law Bosque County, Texas Trial Court No. CV16242 ORDER Appellant’s counsel filed an Anders brief (“Appellant’s Brief and Appendix”) on March 2, 2018. The brief was deficient because, among other things, it was not in compliance with Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.8. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8. Accordingly, we requested that Appellant’s counsel file an amended Anders brief. We further notified Appellant’s counsel that the Anders brief filed on March 2, 2018, would be stricken, and the brief was stricken on March 28, 2018. Appellant’s counsel filed an amended Anders brief (“Appellant’s Brief and Appendix”) on April 6, 2018; however, the Appendix is still not in compliance with Rule 9.8. Rule 9.8 requires the use of an alias when identifying the child in all papers submitted to the Court, including the appendix, in an appeal arising out of a case in which the termination of parental rights was at issue. Seeid. at 9.8(b)(1).
An “alias” is defined as “one or more of a person’s initials or a fictitious name, used to refer to the person.”Id. at 9.8(a).
Even copies of documents that are included in the original appellate record, when sent in any form or for any purpose other than as part of the formal record, must be made to comply with the Rule. To expedite this matter, we order that the Appendix to the amended Anders brief be sealed.Id. at 2.
Appellant’s counsel is instructed that future filings will be expected to be in compliance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, including Rule 9.8. PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed April 18, 2018 In re S.R. Page 2