Black, Loyd Phell v. Texas, the State Of

A
(£aixrt of Appeals
Wxftlf Ststrtri nf Okxas ai Dallas
JUDGMENT
LOYD PHELL BLACK, Appellant Appeal from the County Criminal Court
of Appeals No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas.
No. 05-94-00221-CR V. (Tr.Ct.No. MC93-A-7452-D).
Opinion delivered per curiam before Chief
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justice Thomas and Justices Wright and
Moseley.
Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is
AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered April 30, 1997.
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed April 30, 1997
In The
Qlcurt of Appeals
JRftif Itsirtri of (Bi>xas at Dallas
No. 05-94-00221-CR
LOYD PHELL BLACK, Appellant
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court of Appeals No. 1
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. MC93-A-7452-D
OPINION PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Wright and Moseley
Loyd Phell Black appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial de novo in the
county criminal court of appeals, for failure to maintain financial responsibility.1 The jury
assessed punishment at a $300 fine. Appellant is prosecuting this appeal pro se. The
transcript was filed in this cause on March 25, 1994. No statement of facts has been filed
1See Act of May 27, 1991, 72d Leg., R.S., ch. 242, §10.05,1991 Tex. Gen. Laws 1032,1032, repealed by Act of May 12,
1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 165, § 24(a), 1995Tex. Gen. Laws 1870, 1870 (recodified at Tex. Trans. Code Ann. § 601.191
(Vernon Supp. Pamph. 1997)).
in this cause. On February 14, 1997, this Court sent appellant aletter telling him that since
no statement of facts had been filed, we presumed that none would be forthcoming and
would submit the appeal on the transcript alone.2 We directed appellant to file his brief by
March 16, 1997. The letter further stated that if appellant did not file his brief within the
time specified, we may submit this cause without a brief. We received no response from
appellant. Accordingly, we submit this appeal without briefs.
Absent a brief, no points of error are properly before this Court. Having found no
fundamental error, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
PER CURIAM
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 90
The docket sheet contains an entry that a hearing was held regarding appellant's claim of indigency and the trial court
found that appellant was not indigent.