DocketNumber: 06-08-00099-CR
Filed Date: 7/8/2008
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/7/2015
Tarsha Simmons attempts to appeal the revocation of her community supervision for the underlying offense of driving while intoxicated with a child passenger. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.045 (Vernon Supp. 2007). Simmons was sentenced to eighteen months' confinement. Her sentence was imposed March 12, 2008. An appeal bond, which we deem to be her notice of appeal, was filed May 2, 2008. We received the clerk's record July 1, 2008. The issue before us is whether Simmons timely filed her notice of appeal. We conclude that she did not and dismiss the attempted appeal for want of jurisdiction.
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Rule 26.2(a) prescribes the time period in which a notice of appeal must be filed by a defendant in order to perfect appeal in a criminal case. A defendant's notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. The record does not contain any motion for new trial. The last date Simmons could timely file her notice of appeal was April 11, 2008, thirty days after the day the sentence was imposed in open court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Further, no motion for extension of time was filed in this Court within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal.
Simmons has failed to perfect her appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: July 7, 2008
Date Decided: July 8, 2008
Do Not Publish
iles a motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. The record does not contain any motion for new trial. The last date Carmon could timely file his notice of appeal was October 28, 2005, thirty days after the day the sentence was imposed in open court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Further, no motion for extension of time was filed in this Court within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal.
Carmon has failed to perfect his appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: March 28, 2006
Date Decided: March 29, 2006
Do Not Publish