Miguel Arciba v. State

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-19-00133-CR
MIGUEL ARCIBA,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 40th District Court
Ellis County, Texas
Trial Court No. 31884CR
ABATEMENT ORDER
Appellant, Miguel Arciba, is representing himself in this appeal. Arciba has filed
a document entitled, “Appellant’s Motion for Access to Appellate Record and Second
Extension of Time.”
We first address Arciba’s motion for extension of time to file his brief. We note
that until Arciba gains access to the appellate record, he will not be able to file a compliant
brief because his brief could not contain citations to the record as required. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 38.1(i). Accordingly, Arciba’s motion is granted in part. Specifically, the date by
which Arciba must file a brief in this proceeding is stayed. Arciba’s brief is due 45 days
after the date he obtains access to the record as provided for herein or upon further order
of the Court setting a date for the filing of Arciba’s brief.
We now turn to Arciba’s motion regarding access to a copy of the appellate record,
specifically in this case, the clerk’s record.1 The Clerk of this Court is ordered to send a
copy of the referenced motion to the State, the trial court, and the trial court clerk with a
copy of this Order.
The Rules of Appellate Procedure require the trial court clerk to make a duplicate
copy of the clerk’s record. TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(g). “The trial court clerk must retain the
copy [ ] for the parties to use with the court’s permission.” Id.
This proceeding is abated to the trial court:
1. So that the trial court can act upon the motion as Arciba’s Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 34.5(g) request to use the duplicate copy of the record
in this appeal, see TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(g);
2. So that the trial court can take appropriate action and make appropriate
orders to require the creation of, and access to, the duplicate clerk’s record
in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(g);
3. So that the trial court, or delegate, may communicate with the Warden, or
the Warden’s delegate, to determine the method by which the record will
be made accessible to Arciba, acting as his own counsel, to assure access to
the record by Arciba as necessary for Arciba to conduct research and file a
compliant brief; and
4. So that the trial court may conduct any hearing necessary to determine the
most effective method to make the record accessible to Arciba.
All of the above must take place within 35 days from the date of this Order.
1
There is no reporter’s record for this appeal.
Arciba v. State Page 2
Although the rules contemplate the return of the record after it is used by an
appellant so that an appellee may then use the same record, nothing herein should be
construed so as to prevent the trial court from ordering a complete copy of the appellate
record to be made for Arciba to use and retain. Moreover, nothing herein is intended to
restrict the nature or form of the record to a paper copy only.
A supplemental reporter’s record and clerk’s record for any hearings or orders
which are held or made while this proceeding is abated are due within 21 days after the
date the hearing is held or order is signed.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Neill
Motion for extension granted in part;
Appeal abated
Order issued and filed October 15, 2019
[RWR]
Arciba v. State Page 3