DocketNumber: 10-19-00396-CR
Filed Date: 12/4/2019
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 12/5/2019
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-19-00396-CR IN RE JEREMY PAUL CASTILLO Original Proceeding MEMORANDUM OPINION On November 6, 2019, the Clerk of this Court received and filed a petition for writ of mandamus, dated October 29, 2019, from Relator Jeremy Paul Castillo. The petition does not contain proof of service as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5. However, to expedite this matter, the Court invokes Rule 2 to suspend Rule 9.5.’s proof-of-service requirement. Seeid. R. 2.
Furthermore, because the respondent and real party in interest may access Castillo’s petition through the Court’s website, we do not include a copy of the petition with this Memorandum Opinion. In his petition, Castillo seeks a mandamus from this Court directing the trial court to rule on his “Motion for Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc” that was filed in June 2019. Castillo notes that the motion was filed in trial court numbers 37297CR, 37298CR, and 41522CR. On November 25, 2019, Castillo filed a pleading entitled “Petition for Appeal From the Trial Courts Ruling for Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc.” The matter was filed as a direct appeal and assigned Case Number 10-19-00420-CR. Castillo notes in this most recent filing that he is appealing the trial court’s denial of his Motion for Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc filed in trial court numbers 37297CR, 37298CR, and 41522CR. As the trial court has ruled on the motion that is the basis for his mandamus petition, the relief Castillo seeks is now moot. Accordingly, the petition for mandamus filed by Jeremy Paul Castillo is dismissed. REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed December 4, 2019 Do not publish [OT06] In re Castillo Page 2