Nicholas Hoyt v. State

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-19-00434-CR
NICHOLAS HOYT,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 13th District Court
Navarro County, Texas
Trial Court No. D39232-CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Nicholas Hoyt appeals from the trial court’s interlocutory order
denying his motion to suppress. The denial of a motion to suppress may not be appealed
until after the final judgment is rendered. McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex.
App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (per curiam); see Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794
(Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (“The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review
interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.”).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).
Notwithstanding that we are dismissing this appeal, Hoyt may file a motion for
rehearing with this Court within 15 days after the judgment of this Court is rendered. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If Hoyt desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing
a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal
Appeals within 30 days after either the day this Court’s judgment is rendered or the day
the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a).
REX D. DAVIS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Neill
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed December 11, 2019
Do not publish
[CR25]
Hoyt v. State Page 2