in Re: Invasix, Inc.

DENIED and Opinion Filed March 27, 2019
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-00281-CV
IN RE INVASIX, INC., Relator
Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-17175
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle
Opinion by Justice Bridges
Before the Court is relator Invasix, Inc.’s petition for writ of mandamus, the response brief
of real parties in interest Debbie James and Katylynn Clinich, and relator’s reply brief. In this
original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to continue the
deadlines and hearing on the real parties in interest’s motion for summary judgment and to stay all
trial court proceedings pending resolution of relator’s special appearance.
To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly
abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,
148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we
conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)
(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/David L. Bridges/
DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE
190281F.P05
–2–