DocketNumber： 08-02-00038-CV
Filed Date： 10/24/2002
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/9/2015
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
|
DIANA MAE SIMS, Appellant, v. DONALD L. SIMS, Appellee. |
'
'
'
'
'
' |
No. 08-02-00038-CV Appeal from the 255th District Court of Dallas County, Texas (TC# DF98-12328-S) |
|
|
|
|
OPINION ON MOTION
Appellee=s motion of September 23, 2002 requests that this Court of Appeals deem all of appellant=s issues waived for violating Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.1(h), and requests that we render judgment for appellee. We deny the motion.
Appellee=s motion claims that appellant=s request, contained in her pro se brief, not be held to the level of Atechnical excellence to which practicing attorneys are held@ makes it inappropriate for our review. Citing Brown v. Texas Employment Comm=n, 801 S.W.2d 5, 8 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, writ denied), and Kindley v. State, 879 S.W.2d 261, 264 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, no pet.), appellee contends that pro se parties are to be held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and are not to be afforded any Aspecial treatment@ before the Court. We find the determination of whether or not the arguments are groundless is premature.
It is true, as appellee points out, that Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 38.1(h) requires Aclear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record.@ Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(h). The Court of Appeals has a process by which a brief is screened for compliance with this Court=s requirements prior to filing. This compliance review includes checking for a minimal standard of argument; appellant=s brief met these minimal standards. Whether her issues for review have merit is a question not yet before the Court. That matter will be addressed when both the appellant=s and the appellee=s brief are presented for deliberation. We therefore deny appellee=s motion to deem appellant=s issues waived and to render judgment in favor of appellee.
SUSAN LARSEN, Justice
October 24, 2002
Before Panel No. 1
Larsen, McClure, and Chew, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)