in Re Ted Lawrence Robertson

Opinion issued August 25, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-15-00684-CR
———————————
IN RE TED LAWRENCE ROBERTSON, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Ted Lawrence Robertson, proceeding pro se and incarcerated, has
filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent trial judge
to vacate his February 11, 2009 judgment nunc pro tunc, contending that it was
void because relator was not provided with notice or the opportunity to be heard
before the signing of the judgment and because the error in the original judgment,
if any, constitutes judicial error, not clerical error.1 On September 4, 2014, we
denied relator’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking identical relief as that
sought in this petition. See In re Ted Lawrence Robertson, No. 01-14-00466-CR,
2014 WL 4374124, at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Sept. 4, 2014, orig.
proceeding [mand. denied]) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for
publication). On January 28, 2015, after relator had sought review of this Court’s
denial of his mandamus petition, the Court of Criminal Appeals denied relator’s
motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus without order. See In re Ted Lawrence
Robertson, WR-29,520-19.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 52.8(a), (d). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
1
The underlying case is State of Texas v. Ted Lawrence Robertson, Cause No.
940376, in the 174th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Ruben
Guerrero presiding. On December 30, 2004, this Court affirmed relator’s
conviction. See Robertson v. State, 175 S.W.3d 359, 361 (Tex. App.—Houston
[1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d).