Philip Garay v. State

The State of TexasAppellee/s
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
January 30, 2015
No. 04-14-00252-CR
Philip GARAY,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2013CR2843
Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding
ORDER
On January 26, 2015, appellant Philip Garay filed a pro se motion to dismiss, seeking to
dismiss this appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Appellant also filed a pro se motion
for leave to file a pro se supplemental brief. Counsel has been appointed to represent appellant
in this criminal appeal, and counsel has submitted a brief on appellant’s behalf. In Texas,
appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625
(Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Therefore, appellant’s pro se motions are DENIED. We will only
consider the brief filed by appellant’s counsel.
It is so ORDERED on the 30th day of January, 2015.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: ____________________________
Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court