DocketNumber: 09-06-00344-CR
Filed Date: 3/7/2007
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/10/2015
Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant John Christopher Murphy pled guilty to burglary of a habitation. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Murphy guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Murphy on community supervision for six years, assessed a $1,000 fine, and ordered Murphy to pay restitution in the amount of $310. On March 8, 2006, the State filed a motion to revoke Murphy's unadjudicated probation. Although Murphy offered an explanation for his violation, he pled "true" to violating one of the conditions of his community supervision. The trial court found that Murphy violated one of the community supervision conditions, found Murphy guilty of burglary of a habitation, and assessed punishment at twenty years of confinement.
Murphy's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
DAVID GAULTNEY
Justice
Submitted on February 13, 2007
Opinion Delivered March 7, 2007
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.