DocketNumber： 01-03-00079-CR
Filed Date： 9/18/2003
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/2/2015
Opinion issued September 18, 2003
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-03-00079-CR
____________
GERALDO TRONCOSO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 179th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 686802
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Geraldo Troncoso, pleaded true to the State’s motion to revoke his community supervision. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement for 10 years and a $5000 fine. We affirm.
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief concluding that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds of error to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Moore v. State, 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, pet. ref’d).
The brief states that counsel sent a copy of the brief and the entire appellate record to appellant, whom counsel advised of his right to file a pro se brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than 30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We find no reversible error in the record, and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous.
We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Stephens v. State, 35 S.W.3d 770, 771 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hedges, Nuchia, and Higley.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).