DocketNumber： 13-04-00343-CR
Filed Date： 7/9/2004
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/11/2015
NUMBER 13-04-000343-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
IN RE ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Wittig
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Relator Armando Rodriguez filed a “motion to compel trial court to produce trial records to pro-se petitioner” on July 6, 2004. This motion was not filed in accordance with any pending appeal and, accordingly, the Court will construe the same as an original proceeding.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 52. The petition fails to attach any of the referenced underlying documentation and fails to establish that the district court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act, (2) was asked to perform the act, and (3) failed or refused to do so. See In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum opinion delivered and filed
this 9th day of July, 2004.