DocketNumber： 13-06-00291-CV
Filed Date： 6/21/2006
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/11/2015
|
|
NUMBER 13-06-291-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
_____________________________________________________________
IN RE: MAX YORK AND TINA YORK
_____________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus _____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
Relators, Max York and Tina York, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on June 2, 2006. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the responses filed by real parties in interest, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Furthermore, on June 2, 2006, this Court granted relators' motion to stay all trial court proceedings in cause number C-2009-05-E in Hidalgo County, pending our review of the petition for writ of mandamus. Having denied the petition, the stay is hereby lifted.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 21st day of June, 2006.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).