Constant Derbez v. Ana Gabriela Derbez

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
January 7, 2019
No. 04-18-00937-CV
Constant DERBEZ,
Appellant
v.
Ana Gabriela DERBEZ,
Appellee
From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas
Trial Court No. 16-08-33337-MCVAJA
Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding
ORDER
The trial court signed a final judgment on October 29, 2018. Because appellant did not
file a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion for reinstatement, or request
for findings of fact and conclusions of law, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on November
28, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). However, the notice of appeal was not filed until
November 30, 2018. A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on
December 13, 2018. See id. R. 26.3. Appellant timely filed in this court on December 10, 2018,
a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 26.3. See id.
When, as here, a notice of appeal is untimely filed, but a motion for extension of time is
timely filed in accordance with Rule 26.3, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for
failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615,
615 (Tex. 1997). “[A]ny plausible statement of circumstances indicating that failure to file ...
was not deliberate or intentional, but was the result of inadvertence, mistake, or mischance, will
be accepted as a reasonable explanation.” Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 774 S.W.2d 668, 670
(Tex. 1989); see Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886–87 (Tex. 2003); Dimotsis v. State Farm
Lloyds, 966 S.W.2d 657, 657 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Any conduct short of
deliberate or intentional noncompliance qualifies as inadvertence, mistake or mischance, even if
that conduct can also be characterized as professional negligence. Garcia, 774 S.W.2d at 670;
Hone, 104 S.W.3d at 886–87; Dimotsis, 966 S.W.2d at 657.
In the motion for extension of time, counsel for appellant, who had been hired for
purposes of appeal, states she failed to timely file the notice of appeal because she was orally
advised by the Maverick County District Clerk’s office that the final judgment was signed on
November 1, 2018. Based on that information, she calendared the due date for the notice of
appeal as November 30, 2018, as December 1, 2018 fell on a Saturday. When she subsequently
obtained a copy of the judgment decree, she noted that the first page of the judgment stated it
was “filed at 11/01/2018 at 12:00 a.m.,” which was in accord with the information received from
the district clerk. Counsel filed the notice of appeal on November 30, 2018, based on the
information from the clerk’s office and the notation on the first page of the judgment. Several
days later, when counsel subsequently reviewed the entire judgment, she realized it had actually
been signed on October 29, 2018, rendering her notice of appeal untimely by two days. Counsel
then timely filed a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. After review, we find
counsel’s explanation for the untimely filing to be reasonable. See Garcia, 774 S.W.2d at 670;
Hone, 104 S.W.3d at 886–87; Dimotsis, 966 S.W.2d at 657. We therefore GRANT appellant’s
motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal and ORDER this appeal retained on the
court’s docket.
We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the Maverick
County District Clerk, and the court reporter.
_________________________________
Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 7th day of January, 2019.
___________________________________
KEITH E. HOTTLE,
Clerk of Court