Luro C. Taylor v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Opinion issued July 18, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-19-00241-CV
———————————
LURO C. TAYLOR, Appellant
V.
COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee
On Appeal from the 215th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2016-82179
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Luro C. Taylor, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5,
20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 51.941(a), 101.041;
Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and
Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158
(Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay
the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being
notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not adequately
respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Landau, and Countiss.
2