DocketNumber： 14-04-01068-CR
Filed Date： 1/5/2006
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/15/2015
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 5, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-01068-CR
____________
JAMARCUS DAMONN VIRDINE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 182nd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 989,151
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery on August 5, 2004, without a plea bargain. The trial judge sentenced appellant to eight years of confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Appellant filed a pro se response raising four issues.
We have carefully reviewed the record, the pro se response, and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State, No. PD-300-04, 2005 WL 305779 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 16, 2005) (not yet released for publication). Further, we find no reversible error in the record.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 5, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Guzman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).