DocketNumber: 09-12-00530-CR
Filed Date: 9/25/2013
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2015
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-12-00530-CR ____________________ LEAMON LAQUAY OGUIN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 411th District Court Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. 21570 ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Leamon Laquay Oguin pleaded no contest under a plea agreement to possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. The trial court found him guilty, assessed punishment at seven years of confinement, suspended the imposition of sentence, placed him on community supervision for seven years, and imposed a $2,000.00 fine. After the State filed a motion to revoke, the trial court found appellant violated terms of his community supervision, revoked the supervision, and sentenced him to five years of confinement. Appellant’s counsel 1 filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record. Counsel concludes there are no arguable points of error. See Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738
,87 S. Ct. 1396
,18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967); High v. State,573 S.W.2d 807
(Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se response. We received no response from the appellant. We have reviewed the appellate record and agree with counsel’s conclusion. It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State,813 S.W.2d 503
, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED. ________________________________ DAVID GAULTNEY Justice Submitted on September 16, 2013 Opinion Delivered September 25, 2013 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ. 2