in Re Michael Sutton

                        COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

                                        NO. 2-08-154-CV

IN RE MICHAEL SUTTON                                                         RELATOR

                                              ------------

                                    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

                                              ------------

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION^[1]

                                              ------------

The court has considered relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.^[2]  Accordingly, relator=s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  LIVINGSTON, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and HOLMAN, J.

DELIVERED: April 24, 2008

---

    ^[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

    ^[2]See Wentworth v. Meyer, 839 S.W.2d 766, 767 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); In re Jackson, 14 S.W.3d 843, 846 (Tex. App.CWaco 2000, orig. proceeding); City of La Porte v. State ex rel. Rose, 376 S.W.2d 894, 906-07 (Tex. Civ. App.CAustin 1964), rev=d in part on other grounds, 386 S.W.2d 782 (Tex. 1965); see also In re Sanchez, 81 S.W.3d 794, 796 (Tex. 2002) (orig. proceeding).