Danita Manning v. Lloyd Ernest Mitchell Sr

Opinion issued January 27, 2015.
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-14-00793-CV
———————————
DANITA MANNING, Appellant
V.
LLOYD ERNEST MITCHELL, SR., Appellee
On Appeal from the 311th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2012-46494
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Danita Manning, has neither paid the required fees nor
established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1;
see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013),
101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme
Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on
Multi-district Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further,
appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the
clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal
was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P.
5, 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Lloyd.
2