in Re: Frederick D. Todd, II, M.D., and Frederick D. Todd, II, M.D., P.A. D/B/A Arlington Neurological & Spine Associates

Denied and Opinion Filed March 10, 2014.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-01750-CV
IN RE FREDERICK D. TODD, II, M.D., AND FREDERICK D. TODD, II, M.D., P.A.
D/B/A ARLINGTON NEUROLOGICAL & SPINE ASSOCIATES, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-08-16167-F
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Brown
Opinion by Justice Moseley
Before the Court is relators’ petition for writ of mandamus in which they contend that the
trial court clearly abused its discretion in granting a new trial. The facts and issues are well
known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we
conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
/Jim Moseley/
JIM MOSELEY
JUSTICE
131750F.P05