DocketNumber: 13-12-00419-CV
Filed Date: 8/23/2012
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2015
NUMBER 13-12-00419-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ JOSE L. SOTO, Appellant, v. CITY OF EDINBURG, TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Jose L. Soto, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause no. CL-05-2304-G. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court=s notice. Additionally, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e). The Clerk directed appellant to file an amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of that notice. To date, the defect has not been corrected. An appellate court may dismiss a civil appeal for failure to comply with a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The Court, having considered the documents on file, and appellant’s failure to correct the defects, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. Seeid. 37.3, 42.3(a),(c).
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction and failure to comply with a notice from the Court. Seeid. PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 23rd day of August, 2012. 2