Judges: Speer
Filed Date: 1/30/1909
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
In this motion for a rehearing appellants suggest that we have no jurisdiction of the appeal for the want of a final judgment in the court below, and this suggestion must be sustained. Appellees sued appellants T. A. Williams and Ed Rountree to recover the sum of ten hundred and forty-nine dollars, commissions upon the sale of certain real estate, and appellant Williams pleaded over against appellant Rountree. The judgment of the court was in favor of appellees against appellant Williams for the amount sued for, and in favor of Williams on his plea over against Rountree, but the judgment in no manner makes any disposition of appellee's claim against appellant Rountree. It is quite well established that an appeal will not lie from a judgment which has not disposed of the entire case as to all the parties. (Rhone v. Ellis,
Appeal dismissed.
Stockwell v. Angleton State Bank ( 1913 )
Hamilton v. D. S. Cage Co. ( 1912 )
Texas Bank & Trust Co. of Dallas v. Clay ( 1953 )
Trinity County Dumber Co. v. Conner ( 1916 )
Lennox v. Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n ( 1927 )
Wichita Mill & Elevator Co. v. Burrus ( 1914 )