Citation Numbers: 159 S.W. 73, 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 1346
Judges: Dunklin
Filed Date: 5/17/1913
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of Henry Ford against defendant, J. D. Wilson, instituted in the county court of Wichita county to recover upon certain promissory notes and for a foreclosure of chattel mortgage liens upon several horses and a crop of 150 acres of cotton.
Neither the original nor the supplemental petition, which constituted the pleadings upon which plaintiff relied upon the trial, contains any allegation of the value of the property upon which a foreclosure of lien was sought. According to the well-settled rule, if the value of this property exceeded the sum of $1,000, the county court had no jurisdiction of plaintiff's suit.
In the absence of an affirmative showing of jurisdiction of the county court to hear and determine the controversy, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded; and it is so ordered. Ware v. Clark,
Reversed and remanded.
Ware v. Clark , 58 Tex. Civ. App. 356 ( 1910 )
Stricklin v. Arrington Carter , 1911 Tex. App. LEXIS 400 ( 1911 )
Cantrell v. Cawyer , 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 480 ( 1913 )
Marshall v. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. , 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 498 ( 1914 )
Richardson v. Hethcock , 1915 Tex. App. LEXIS 49 ( 1915 )
Reeves v. Faris , 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 662 ( 1916 )
Bush v. Campbell , 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 208 ( 1918 )
Lusk v. Hardin , 1915 Tex. App. LEXIS 571 ( 1915 )
R. O. Kipp Co. v. Anglin , 1925 Tex. App. LEXIS 197 ( 1925 )
McKee v. Le Fors , 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 379 ( 1923 )
People's Ice Co. v. Phariss , 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 396 ( 1918 )