DocketNumber： 03-99-00620-CR
Filed Date： 6/29/2000
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/5/2015
386 U.S. 738
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-99-00620-CR
Juan Medellin, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 0952245, HONORABLE JON N. WISSER, JUDGE PRESIDING Appellant Juan Medellin waived his right to trial by jury and pleaded guilty to murder. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.02 (West 1994). The district court adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment at imprisonment for forty years.
Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,
(1967), by advancing a contention which counsel says might arguably support the appeal. See also Penson v. Ohio,488 U.S. 75
(1988); High v. State,573 S.W.2d 807
(Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,516 S.W.2d 684
(Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State,485 S.W.2d 553
(Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State,436 S.W.2d 137
(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. A discussion of the contention advanced in counsel's brief would serve no beneficial purpose.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Jan P. Patterson, Justice
Before Justices Jones, Yeakel and Patterson
Affirmed
Filed: June 29, 2000
Do Not Publish