in Re: Dennis Hood, Relator

NO. 07-01-0501-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
JANUARY18, 2002
______________________________
IN RE DENNIS HOOD, RELATOR
_______________________________
Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
By this original proceeding, relator Dennis Hood, proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the 181st District Court of
Potter County to issue a bench warrant for him to return to Potter County for a new trial
after his conviction was reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings on April
29, 1997. For the reasons expressed herein, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
Pursuant to this Court’s request, the State filed a response to relator’s petition
indicating that relator’s case is presently set for trial at the March or April 2002 docket. The
State also attached certified copies of an Application for Bench Warrant and Bench
1
Tex. R. App. P. 47.1.
Warrant to have relator brought before the 181st District Court of Potter County for a
hearing on February 4, 2002. Inasmuch as the relief sought to be compelled by relator’s
petition has been performed, this proceeding is moot and this Court will not issue a
meaningless writ. Continental Oil Company v. Lesher, 500 S.W.2d 183, 186
(Tex.Civ.App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1973, no writ); see also Correa v. First Court of Appeals,
795 S.W.2d 704, 705 (Tex. 1990) (holding that appellate courts do not decide cases in
which no controversy exists between the parties).
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.
Don H. Reavis
Justice
Do not publish.
2