DocketNumber： 14-03-01311-CV
Filed Date： 5/12/2005
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 9/15/2015
Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed May 12, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
_______________
NO. 14-03-01311-CV
_______________
THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND
SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant
V.
THE CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellee
_________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 789,496
_________________________________________________________
C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N
The dismissal in this case could only properly be granted and affirmed based on a jurisdictional issue, such as governmental immunity from suit. Preemption is not such an issue, either generally,[1]or in this particular case, because the county court will have subject matter jurisdiction over the condemnation action, even if some portions of the condemnation statute are preempted. Beyond recognizing that the dismissal cannot properly be affirmed on the preemption issue in any event (because it is not jurisdictional), any ruling in this appeal on preemption would go beyond the jurisdictional issues governing the dismissal to reach the merits of the underlying claims and thus be an advisory opinion which we have no jurisdiction to issue.[2] Therefore, our decision in this appeal should not address the preemption issue on the merits.
/s/ Richard H. Edelman
Justice
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed May 12, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Edelman, and Guzman. (Yates, J., majority.)
[1] See, e.g., Mills v. Warner Lambert Co., 157 S.W.3d 424, 427 (Tex. 2005).
[2] See, e.g., McAllen Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Cortez, 66 S.W.3d 227, 232 (Tex. 2001).