in Re Marshall S. Hicks

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14-00343-CR
IN RE MARSHALL S. HICKS
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Marshall Shane Hicks was convicted in 2010 of indecency with a child. His
original appeal of that conviction was transferred from this Court to the Thirteenth
Court of Appeals (Corpus Christi). That appeal was dismissed because the conviction
was based on a plea bargain and Hicks had no right to appeal.
On October 30, 2014, Hicks filed a document entitled “Motion for Judgment to
Correct Clerical Mistake (Nunc Pro Tunc)” as an original proceeding requesting relief
directly from this Court. The purpose of a nunc pro tunc judgment is to provide a
method for trial courts to make a correction when there is a discrepancy between the
judgment as pronounced in court and the written judgment reflected in the record.
Blanton v. State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 897-898 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).
By this proceeding, Hicks has asked this Court to correct the opinion and
judgment by the Thirteenth Court of Appeals. We have no jurisdiction over the
opinions or judgments of other courts of appeals. See TEX. CONST. ART. V, § 6(a).
Accordingly, this proceeding is dismissed.
TOM GRAY
Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed November 20, 2014
Do not publish
[OT06]
In re Hicks Page 2