William Charles Webb v. State

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-12-00230-CR
WILLIAM CHARLES WEBB,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 54th District Court
McLennan County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2012-675-C2
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed what appeared to be a pro se interlocutory notice of appeal of the
trial court’s ruling on his motion for bond reduction. A week later he filed a similar
notice of appeal in this case.
The Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that this case was subject to dismissal
for want of jurisdiction and that the Court might dismiss his appeal unless he showed
grounds for continuing it. Appellant did not respond to the Clerk’s letter.1
This Court lacks jurisdiction over a trial court‘s denial of a motion for bond
reduction when the appeal is not from the trial court’s denial of a pretrial application
for writ of habeas corpus in which the appellant sought bond reduction. See Benford v.
State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 409 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.); see also Sanchez v. State, 340
S.W.3d 848, 849 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2011, no pet.). Accordingly, this appeal is
dismissed for want of jurisdiction.2
REX D. DAVIS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed August 30, 2012
Do not publish
[CR25]
1 Appellant filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in this appeal. We dismiss it for lack of
jurisdiction because courts of appeals do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law
matters. See Ex parte Price, 228 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Hearon,
3 S.W.3d 650 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, orig. proceeding).
2 We dismiss as moot Appellant’s pending motion for speedy trial and motion to withdraw attorney of
record.
Webb v. State Page 2