DocketNumber: 06-12-00026-CV
Filed Date: 3/8/2012
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2015
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-12-00026-CV ______________________________ IN RE: CRAWFORD FAMILY FARM PARTNERSHIP Original Mandamus Proceeding Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss MEMORANDUM OPINION Crawford Family Farm Partnership (Crawford) has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which it seeks to convince this Court to order the trial court to set aside its denial of Crawford’s requested injunctive relief—and also to grant temporary injunctive relief—pending the outcome of the condemnation case against Crawford filed by TransCanada Keystone Pipeline. Crawford’s filing reached this Court late Friday afternoon and requested emergency relief, which we chose to grant only in an abundance of caution to preserve our jurisdiction, and which, given time to review, we conclude should be dissolved in our disposition of this mandamus. We grant the extraordinary relief of mandamus only when the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Team Rocket, L.P.,256 S.W.3d 257
(Tex. 2008). In this case, the order at bar is one refusing a temporary injunction. Such an order is explicitly appealable. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2011). The remedy of mandamus is therefore not available. Crawford’s petition asks this Court that, if we find we cannot consider the mandamus request, we refile the case as a direct interlocutory appeal. The jurisdiction of a court of appeals is invoked by timely filing documents showing a bona fide intent to appeal. See Verburgt v. Dorner,959 S.W.2d 615
, 616 (Tex. 1997). In an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed within twenty days after the judgment is signed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). The document thus indicates the clear desire to bring an appeal required of an effective notice of appeal, and we 2 will so treat it. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus and withdraw our order granting emergency relief issued in connection with the petition. 1 By separate order dated this date, we refile Crawford’s filing as an interlocutory appeal and make further orders relative to that appeal. Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice Date Submitted: March 8, 2012 Date Decided: March 8, 2012 1 TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10. 3