Frankie Lee Watson v. State

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00088-CR
NO. 02-13-00089-CR
FRANKIE LEE WATSON APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
------------
Frankie Lee Watson appealed, and we affirmed, his convictions for
aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. See Watson v. State, Nos. 02-11-
00040-CR, 02-11-00041-CR, 2012 WL 117931, at *1, *9 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth
Jan. 12, 2012, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
After Watson filed another notice of appeal in both cases, we sent him a
letter stating our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeals and asked
1
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
that he, or any party desiring to continue the appeals, file a response by April 1,
2013, showing grounds for continuing the appeals or we would dismiss them for
want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 19.3, 44.3. No response has been filed.
Therefore, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.
43.2(f); State v. Holloway, 360 S.W.3d 480, 489 & n.59 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012)
(noting that the court of criminal appeals has “always assiduously guarded its
exclusive jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief in felony
cases”).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: May 2, 2013
2