Andrew Stephen Perez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00147-CR
ANDREW STEPHEN PEREZ APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
CONCURRING MEMORANDUM OPINION1
----------
Because the majority opinion does not address appellant’s two remaining
issues, I concur.
When a case is reversed, we are required only to address those issues
that are dispositive. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.1. However, when a case is
remanded, potentially for a new trial, we are to address those issues likely to
recur if appellant is retried for the same offense. Davis v. State, 144 S.W.3d 192,
1
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
201 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2004, pet. ref’d) (op. on reh’g). Because the majority
does not address these two issues, I concur in the opinion, but join in the result
and judgment.
TERRIE LIVINGSTON
CHIEF JUSTICE
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: April 25, 2013
2