Mary Feild Jarvis v. Frank Ewing Feild and John Shaw Feild

NUMBER 13-11-00081-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE MONICA MICHELENA
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1
Relator, Monica Michelena, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above
cause on February 15, 2011, seeking to compel the trial court to transfer venue of a suit
affecting the parent-child relationship from Hidalgo County, Texas, to Cameron County,
Texas. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 155.204 (Vernon 2008). By order issued on
February 17, 2011, the Court requested that the real party in interest, Robert Michelena,
file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus, and such response was duly filed
on February 28, 2011.
1
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is
not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
Currently pending before the Court is relator’s motion to supplement the record.
The Court hereby grants the motion to supplement the record. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.7(a)(2), (b).
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself
entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
See id. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
10th day of March, 2011.
2