Miguel Zaragoza v. Precision Tools and Chesapeake

NUMBER 13-10-00575-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
MIGUEL ZARAGOZA, APPELLANT,
v.
PRECISION TOOLS AND CHESAPEAKE, APPELLEES.
____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 275th District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Miguel Zaragoza, appealed judgments entered by the 275th District
Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. On October 22, 2010, the Clerk of this Court notified
appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 9.5 and 25.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, 25.1. The Clerk directed appellant to
file an amended notice of appeal with the district clerk’s office within thirty days from the
date of that notice.
On December 9, 2010, the Court again advised appellant that the notice of appeal
failed to comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, specifically rules 9.5(e),
25.1(d)(2), and 25.1(d)(7). The Clerk notified appellant that the appeal would be
dismissed if the defects were not cured after the expiration of ten days from the date of
receipt of the Court's notice. Appellant has failed to correct the defects or otherwise
respond to the Court's notices.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s failure to
correct these defects, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id.
42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the
3rd day of February, 2011.
2