DocketNumber: 01-13-00666-CR
Filed Date: 2/13/2014
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2015
Opinion issued February 13, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00666-CR ——————————— PAUL LEYMON PAIGE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 185th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1387998 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Paul Leymon Paige, pleaded guilty to the state jail felony offense of possession of a controlled substance.1 The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, 1 See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(a), (b) (West 2010). sentenced appellant to ten months’ confinement. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. Seeid. The trial
court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State,154 S.W.3d 610
, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State,183 S.W.3d 675
, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. 2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 3