DocketNumber: 04-11-00279-CR
Filed Date: 5/18/2011
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00279-CR IN RE Richard LOPEZ Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 18, 2011 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On April 14, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking relief from the trial court’s denial of relator’s “Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Seeking Relief from Double Jeopardy.” However, in order to obtain a petition for writ of mandamus in a criminal proceeding, relator must establish: (1) the act sought to be compelled is ministerial rather than discretionary in nature, and (2) there is no adequate remedy at law. Dickens v. Second Court of Appeals,727 S.W.2d 542
, 548 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987). Relator has failed to establish he lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. An immediate appeal from the denial of relief in a habeas corpus proceeding regarding a double jeopardy claim is permitted. Greenwell v. Court of Appeals for 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-5395, styled State of Texas v. Richard Lopez, in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding. 04-11-00279-CR Thirteenth Judicial Dist.,159 S.W.3d 645
, 650 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-