Ex Parte Justin Glaze Edmonds

Opinion issued November 20, 2018
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-18-00235-CR
———————————
EX PARTE JUSTIN GLAZE EDMONDS, Appellant
On Appeal from the 506th District Court
Grimes County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 18177
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Justin Glaze Edmonds appealed the trial court’s denial of his
pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss this appeal as moot.
The State has suggested that this appeal is moot. In his application, appellant
challenged the indictment on constitutional grounds. On October 5, 2018, a
supplemental clerk’s record was filed, containing an order granting the State’s
motion to dismiss this cause because the charging instrument was “incorrectly
charged.” Because the cause has been dismissed, the issues raised in this appeal of
the denial of his application challenging the indictment, which is no longer in effect,
are moot. See, e.g., State v. Golding, 398 S.W.3d 745, 747 (Tex. App.—Houston
[1st Dist.] 2011, pet. ref’d).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
2