Carl Smith v. Houston Police Department

Opinion issued May 20, 2014.
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-13-00828-CV
———————————
CARL SMITH, Appellant
V.
HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellee
On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2012-64456
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Carl Smith, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 (West
Supp. 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases
in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,
Misc. Docket No. 07-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After being notified that this
appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.
2