DocketNumber： 12-02-00061-CV
Filed Date： 8/14/2002
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 2/19/2016
THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE
BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION
OF M.S.
Appellant M.S. appeals from an order of commitment for temporary inpatient mental health
services. After a hearing without a jury, the trial court ordered M.S. committed to Terrell State Hospital for a period not to exceed ninety days. Of Appellant's eight issues, we consider only his complaint that the trial court erred in conducting a hearing without the necessary physicians' certificates on file. We reverse the trial court's order and render judgment ordering Appellant's immediate release.
On February 1, 2002, an application for court-ordered temporary mental health services was filed requesting the court commit Appellant to Terrell State Hospital for a period not to exceed ninety days. The application was supported by a certificate of medical examination for mental illness, prepared by a physician, Dr. Wanda Michaels, who had examined Appellant on January 30, 2002.
The hearing on the application convened on the morning of February 6, 2002. After Dr. Michaels testified, the State rested and closed. During an ensuing bench conference, the State conceded that a second certificate of medical examination, that of Dr. Cira J. DeLeon, is deficient. It was not explained on the record in what way it is deficient. Dr. DeLeon's certificate is not in the appellate record. The trial judge stated that he would wait until 1:00 p.m. that day to make a ruling. He explained that constitutional formalities had not been followed and he would dismiss the case at 1:00 p.m. unless he found some law that allowed him to hold Appellant. Our record does not contain a reporter's record of any proceedings held on the afternoon of February 6, 2002 and apparently there were none.
Court reconvened the following day. No explanation is provided on the record regarding the trial court's change of heart or the state of the proceedings. Curiously, each party was represented by a different attorney than it had been the day before. The State again presented the testimony of Dr. Michaels. It then presented testimony of Dr. Vassil Tchokoev, who had examined Appellant the day before. Dr. Tchokoev had also completed a certificate documenting his examination. His certificate had been filed at 1:30 p.m. on February 6, 2002. The State rested and Appellant moved for a directed verdict, pointing out that the physicians' certificates were never placed into evidence. The trial court refused the State's request to admit the certificates but did take judicial notice of them. The motion for directed verdict was denied. Appellant rested and closed without presenting any evidence. The trial court orally granted the application. However, the order granting the application and ordering Appellant's temporary commitment reflects that it was signed on February 6, 2002 and filed on February 7, 2002.
In his seventh issue, Appellant contends the trial court erred in conducting the hearing when only one of the two required physicians' certificates was on file. As the statutory provision requiring two certificates is mandatory, he argues, the absence of one certificate leaves the trial court without jurisdiction to hear the case.
Section 574.009 of the Texas Health and Safety Code provides:
* * *
Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 574.009(a), (d) (Vernon Supp. 2002). The provision that two certificates must be on file at the time of the hearing is mandatory. If the certificates are not on file, the case must be dismissed. In re J.J., 900 S.W.2d 353, 355 (Tex. App.- Texarkana 1995, no writ).
Here, only one physician's certificate was on file at the time the hearing began on the morning of February 6, 2002. The certificate of Dr. Tchokoev was not filed until that afternoon. The State admitted on February 6 that one certificate was deficient and conceded in its brief on appeal that the record does not show that two certificates were on file at the time set for the hearing. Notwithstanding the trial court's apparent attempt to begin the hearing again on the following day, we must conclude that the procedure utilized did not comply with the statute. We sustain Appellant's seventh issue. Due to our disposition of this issue, we need not consider his remaining issues. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.1.
We reverse the trial court's order for temporary inpatient mental health services and order Appellant released from detention if he is not presently at liberty.
LOUIS B. GOHMERT, JR.
Chief Justice
Opinion delivered August 14, in the Year of our Lord 2002.
Panel consisted of Gohmert, Jr., C.J., Worthen, J., and Griffith, J.