DocketNumber： 05-17-01410-CV
Filed Date： 1/16/2018
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 1/18/2018
DENY; and Opinion Filed January 16, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01410-CV IN RE NUSRAT PERVEEN, Relator Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06933 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Fillmore In this original proceeding, relator complains of a final default judgment and a subsequent contempt order. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,148 S.W.3d 124
, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought). /Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE 171410F.P05