DocketNumber: 04-22-00498-CR
Filed Date: 9/21/2022
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/27/2022
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00498-CR Alexander E. GARZA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR8604 Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 21, 2022 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On June 7, 2022, appellant Alexander E. Garza was convicted of aggravated assault against a public servant, and he filed a pro se notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s judgment. The clerk’s record contains a copy of the judgment of conviction, but it does not include a motion for new trial. Because Garza did not file a motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due by July 7, 2022 or a notice and motion for extension of time was due fifteen days later. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. However, the clerk’s record shows Garza’s notice of appeal was postmarked 04-22-00498-CR on July 26, 2022 and file-stamped on July 28, 2022, and there is nothing in the record indicating he filed a motion for extension of time. See id. R. 26.3. A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State,918 S.W.2d 519
, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Because it appeared the notice of appeal was untimely, we ordered Garza to show cause in writing by September 14, 2022 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Seeid.
Garza’s counsel filed a response confirming the notice of appeal was untimely. Accordingly, because Garza’s notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id.; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals,802 S.W.2d 241
(Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). All pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Do Not Publish -2-