in Re Barbara Walker

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Conditionally Granted and Opinion filed
January 13, 2020.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-20-00009-CV
IN RE BARBARA WALKER, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Grimes County, Texas
OPINION
Relator Barbara Walker holds the office of County Commissioner for Precinct
3 of Grimes County, Texas. She is a candidate for re-election to that office in the
March 3, 2020 Democratic Party Primary Election.
On January 6, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.
See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Supp.); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the
petition, relator asks this court to compel Grimes County Democratic Party
Chairman James Harris (“Harris”) to declare Michael Raska (“Raska”) ineligible as
a candidate for the office of County Commissioner Precinct 3 for Grimes County,
Texas because Raska was not a registered voter in Precinct 3 on the December 9,
2019 deadline for filing his application for a place on the ballot, as required by
section 141.001(a)(6) of the Election Code. See Tex. Elec. Code Ann.
§141.001(a)(6) (Supp.).
We conditionally grant relief.
JURISDICTION
“The supreme court or a court of appeals may issue a writ of mandamus to
compel the performance of any duty imposed by law in connection with the holding
of an election or a political party convention, regardless of whether the person
responsible for performing the duty is a public officer.” Tex. Elec. Code Ann. §
273.061 (emphasis added). This court has mandamus jurisdiction to direct a party
official to perform his duty correctly. See Escobar v. Sutherland, 917 S.W.2d 399,
411 (Tex. App. – El Paso 1996, orig. proceeding). Relator was not required to first
seek relief in the district court. See In re Woodfill, 470 S.W.3d 473, 481 (Tex. 2015)
(orig. proceeding).
MANDAMUS STANDARD
A writ of mandamus will issue to compel the performance of a ministerial act
or duty. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992). An act is ministerial
when the law clearly spells out a duty to be performed by a public official with such
certainty that nothing is left to the official’s discretion. Anderson v. City of Seven
Points, 806 S.W.2d 791, 793 (Tex. 1992).
The Texas Supreme Court has emphasized that the sections of the Election
Code dealing with candidacy for political office are mandatory and are to be strictly
enforced. Wallace v. Howell, 707 S.W.2d 876, 877 (Tex.1986) (orig. proceeding).
2
Harris has a ministerial duty to declare Raska ineligible if presented with public
records conclusively showing that he is ineligible. See Tex. Elec. Code Ann.
§141.003(f) and (g) (Supp.). “The party chair’s duty to determine whether an
application for a place on the ballot complies with the statutory requirements is
ministerial.” In re Triantaphyllis, 68 S.W.3d 861, 869 (Tex. App. —Houston [14th
Dist.] 2002, orig. proceeding).
ANALYSIS
Under Section 141.001(a)(6) of the Election Code, a candidate for the office of
County Commissioner for Precinct 3 must be a registered voter in that territory on the
date of the December 9, 2019 deadline for filing his application for a place on the ballot.
See Tex. Elec. Code Ann. §141.001(a)(6) (Supp.); In re Perez, 508 S.W.3d 500 (Tex.
App.—El Paso 2016, orig. proceeding). Section 1.005(16) of the Election Code defines
a “registered voter” as a person registered to vote in this state whose registration is
effective. Tex. Elec. Code Ann. §1.005(16) (Supp.). Section 13.143(a) of the Election
Code provides that a registration becomes effective on the 30th day after the date the
application is submitted to the registrar. Tex. Elec. Code Ann. §13.143(a) (Supp.).
Relator presented Harris with public records showing that Raska did not give
notice of his change of address and register to vote in Precinct 3 until December 9, 2019.
Raska’s registration did not become effective until 30 days later, January 8, 2020. See
Tex. Elec. Code Ann. §13.143(a). In In re Perez, 508 S.W.3d at 506–08, the El Paso
Court of Appeals held, based on almost identical facts, that (1) “In the context of the
office of El Paso County Commissioner, ‘the territory from which the office is elected’
necessarily refers to Precinct 3 rather than all of El Paso County” because the County
Commissioner for Precinct 3 is elected by the qualified voters who are registered to vote
3
in Precinct 3, and (2) “Quintanilla’s voter registration was not effective until the 30th
day after he submitted his address change, that is, January 6, 2016.” (citing Tex. Elec.
Code Ann. § 13.143(a)). We agree with the reasoning and the decision in the Perez
opinion.
Because the public records show that Raska was not effectively registered to vote
in Precinct 3 on the December 9, 2019 deadline for filing his application for a place on
the ballot, Harris has a ministerial duty to declare Raska ineligible as a candidate for the
office of County Commissioner Precinct 3 for Grimes County, Texas.1
CONCLUSION
For these reasons, we conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus,
and direct Harris to immediately declare Raska ineligible as a candidate and to
provide notice of such declaration to the Texas Secretary of State, the State Chair of
the Texas Democratic Party, and the Grimes County Clerk today, December 13,
2020. We are certain Harris will act in accordance with this opinion. The writ of
mandamus shall issue only if he fails to do so.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Bourliot.
1
Neither Harris nor Raska have provided this court with any public records showing that Raska
was effectively registered to vote in Precinct 3 on the December 9, 2019 deadline. This court, by e-mail,
requested Raska to file a response to the petition by January 9, 2019, but Raska has not filed a response.
4