Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00593-CR IN RE James MYART Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2020 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relator James Myart filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in which he asks this court to order the trial court to set a bond or release relator pending a hearing on the State’s motion to adjudicate guilt. Myart is represented by counsel in the trial court; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). PER CURIAM Do not publish 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CR0945, styled The State of Texas v. James Willie Myart, Jr., pending in the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.