in Re SuEllen Hoeflinger-Hotchkiss

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-19-00872-CV
IN RE SuEllen HOEFLINGER-HOTCHKISS
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 12, 2020
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On December 17, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On January 21, 2020,
the real parties in interest filed a response. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only
when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed
by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833,
839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the petition, the response, and the record,
this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ
of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018PC0587, styled In the Estate of Gregory Lyle Hotchkiss a/k/a Gregory
L. Hotchkiss, Deceased, pending in the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Oscar J. Kazen
presiding.