in Re: Phyllis Lee

DENY and Opinion Filed February 13, 2020
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-20-00168-CV
IN RE PHYLLIS LEE, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-06171
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Pedersen
Opinion by Justice Bridges
Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and “motion for TEX. R. CIV.
P. 694.” Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show both that the trial court has
clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential
Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and
the mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested.
Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief
sought).
We also DENY relator’s motion.
/David L. Bridges/
DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE
200168F.P05
2